Categories
Reviews

Book Review: Minority Rule

A decent history of American politics in the post-Obama era has yet to be written. One can’t rely upon any of the conservative principals to author one, because they have been drinking at the well of minority rule for too long. A Trump autobiography? He didn’t even write The Art of the Deal.

Enter Ari Berman’s new book, Minority Rule: The Right-Wing Attack on the Will of the People–and the Fight to Resist It, published in April. It provides a well-researched and relatable history of an issue that has been at the heart of modern conservatism since Pat Buchanan worked in the Nixon White House.

In a 1995 National Press Club address, Buchanan, then a presidential candidate, said, “If present trends hold, white Americans will be a minority by 2050.” This underlying fear mongering became endemic to Republican politics and drove the ascendancy of the 45th president. Irrational fears the United States would transform from a First World Power to Third World status drove conservative voters to the ballot box.

In my reading of books about the rise of Donald Trump as president, Berman is the first author to tell a clear, coherent, and relatable story of that time. Minority rule is at the heart of current Republican policy and behavior and Berman lays it all out for the reader.

While the 1965 Voting Rights Act broadened access to the ballot, conservative white folks were aghast and feared they would become a racial and political minority. During the Johnson administration, an emphasis on immigration of whites was transformed to a broader band of global populations. Enter Trump to both fan the racist, anti-immigrant flames, and get elected as a supposed fire fighter for the fires he started.

Berman outlines the constitutional and legal structure that enables minority rule in the United States. The conduct of the U.S. Census, having two U.S. Senators per state regardless of population, the growth of the filibuster, the electoral college, and drawing political districts in a way that disenfranchises non-white voters, all play a part in enabling minority rule, according to Berman.

While it may sound easy to keep the U.S. Census above politics, it was politicized during the 2020 census by the administration. Having two U.S. Senators, combined with the filibuster enables senators representing a minority of the population to set policy and block majority-favored laws they don’t like. Political gerrymandering, especially in states like Wisconsin and Michigan entrenched minority rule and blocked attempts for political districts to represent the people in the state. There is no magic bullet to fix any of these issues. Entrenched, minority rule makes it more difficult.

In Minority Rule, Berman outlines the role of The Heritage Foundation’s sister organization, Heritage Action, in our politics. Heritage Action is a 501(c)4 nonprofit conservative policy advocacy organization founded in 2010. The Heritage Foundation was restricted from advocating policy, so they created this offshoot, which has become one of the most powerful political lobbying groups in the nation. Iowa is one of the states where these dark money groups have been active.

Ari Berman gets a thumbs up for this book, and I recommend you read it yourself. Minority rule is endemic to the problems of politics in 2024. Berman helps us get a grip on it. He also provides hope the electorate can address the problem and embolden democracy going forward. He presents evidence such a movement has already started.

I also recommend Berman’s previous book, Give Us the Ballot: The Modern Struggle for Voting Rights in America.

Categories
Living in Society

April Showers

Volunteer cilantro from the garden.

April is ending with rain showers. As hot as the atmosphere and ocean have been, I expect an abundance of rain in 2024. Our local newspaper wrote there will be “bouts of record-challenging high temperatures throughout the nation and the possibility of the hottest summer ever observed.” Call it the climate crisis, call it a lot of rain, call it whatever you will yet these are crazy times and the weather became crazy along with it.

A friend and I organized a political meet and greet at the public library so voters could meet candidates before the June 4 primary election. As mentioned yesterday, the primary election may as well be the November general election for county supervisors: The county electorate is liberal compared to many Iowa counties and Republicans on the November ballot don’t stand a chance.

It is no surprise there is discontent among the electorate. That is the county Democratic resting happy face. Two new candidates challenged three incumbents for county supervisor. I spent time at our event with each of the five, including the ones I am just getting to know. They are all good people with a set of manners one expects from a candidate for public office. Incumbency is difficult to overcome unless someone did something terribly wrong. There is no evidence of that among these incumbents.

The state house races are just beginning and neither the state senate nor representative candidate was ready with campaign literature or yard signs. April politics is a parade gathering in a field waiting for the grand marshal’s signal to start. There is a lot of milling about. All eight candidates at the event, including the county sheriff, are solid.

Inside the front entrance to the library is a stone wall with the chiseled names of original donors who built it. Our public library used to be under the bandstand in a city park, then moved to the former fire station. Both spaces were incredibly small for a library in a city and surrounding community of more than 10,000 people. Many take for granted having a well-built library with a robust staff. Not every small community can afford it. The original community donations, in money and sweat equity, set the path for a great local resource we use for our political meetings and many other things.

Morning sunlight is drying the driveway as I type these words. No rain is forecast so it should be a decent day of outdoors work. Soon it will be time to get cabbages in the ground.

Categories
Living in Society

Abortion Heads Back to the Supreme Court

U.S. Supreme Court Building, Washington, D.C. Photo Credit – U.S. Supreme Court Website.

When the U.S. Supreme Court decided Dobbs vs. Jackson Women’s Health Organization on June 22, 2022, it was a matter of time before abortion would have another hearing in the high court. On Wednesday this week justices heard oral arguments on whether the State of Idaho’s abortion ban is constitutional in Moyle vs. United States. Alice Miranda Ollstein and Josh Gerstein reported on Politico:

The Supreme Court on Wednesday will consider — for the first time since it overturned Roe v. Wade —whether an individual state’s abortion ban is constitutional.

The justices will hear arguments on whether federal law requires emergency room physicians in Idaho to perform abortions to stabilize pregnant patients experiencing a medical crisis despite the state’s near-total prohibition on the procedure, which only allows doctors to end a pregnancy when the mother’s life is in danger.

It’s the second major abortion case of the term, following last month’s arguments over the FDA’s regulation of the widely used abortion pill mifepristone, and the latest example of how overturning Roe and returning abortion rights to the states did not keep the courts out of the fray, as some justices had hoped. Decisions in both cases are expected in June.

The Idaho case homes in on the clash between red states’ desire to ban nearly all abortions and President Joe Biden administration’s efforts to preserve some access to the procedure, and the arguments come amid a roiling national debate on the issue. And it comes as doctors around the country plead for clarity on the parameters of the medical emergency exemptions to state bans, warning that vague definitions of “life-threatening” and the prospect of criminal charges are creating a chilling effect that deters them from providing needed care in patients’ most vulnerable moments.

5 questions about the Supreme Court’s next major abortion case by Alice Miranda Ollstein and Josh Gerstein, April 24, 2024.

Read the entire article here. I recommend following Alice Miranda Ollstein’s work at Politico.

The irony in 2024 is that Roe Vs. Wade was the compromise on what was then, and continues to be, the controversial issue of abortion. It is unlikely times have changed in that regard since Jan. 22, 1973, when Roe was decided (7-2). Despite talk about “letting the states decide” on abortion, given diversity of opinion among the states, combined with Republican efforts to have government control women’s bodies and health care, SCOTUS will inevitably have to re-decide Roe or something like it. When that will be is anyone’s guess, yet I submit, that day is coming.

Based on the boiling-over outrage I heard from three female justices during oral arguments on Wednesday, Idaho seems unlikely to prevail in this case. I mean, if one is arguing a case before the Supreme Court in support of your state’s extreme abortion ban, you might need Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett on your side. Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern explained on Slate:

Justice Amy Coney Barrett famously provided the crucial fifth vote to overturn Roe v. Wade in 2022. So if you are arguing in favor of an abortion ban, you probably don’t want to alienate Barrett—by, say, condescendingly dismissing her concerns when she points out that your legal theory doesn’t make any sense. Yet that is what Joshua Turner did on Wednesday while defending Idaho’s draconian abortion restrictions, and much to Barrett’s evident irritation. Turner—who represented the Idaho solicitor general’s office in the second major abortion case to come before the high court after it promised us in its Dobbs opinion that the court was out of the abortion business in 2022—might just have lost his case by repeatedly mansplaining his self-contradictory position to Barrett and the other three women justices. In his toneless, dispassionate telling, his entirely incomprehensible position was just too complex for them to understand. And so he just kept repeating it, over and over. These justices, including Barrett, sounded increasingly fed up with his chin-stroking dissembling on an issue that’s literally life-or-death for pregnant women in red states.

The Lawyer Defending Idaho’s Abortion Ban Irritated the One Justice He Needed on His Side by Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern, Slate, April 24, 2024.

Read the rest of the article here. You can’t go wrong reading Dahlia Lithwick. How the case is decided is anyone’s guess after oral arguments.

Democratic Congressional Candidate Christina Bohannan held a round table discussion about abortion on March 26 in Iowa City. 10 people were in attendance to share their personal experiences and thoughts on the state of abortion rights in Iowa, according to the Daily Iowan. Citing a Des Moines Register poll, “61 percent of adults in Iowa believe abortion should be legal in all or most situations, and 35 percent believe abortions should be illegal in most or all situations.” A lot is at stake in the post-Dobbs era. It will take election of Democrats to turn the Republican tide that favors government intrusion into a woman’s health care.

Here is a link to the Iowa Democratic Party to get involved today.

Categories
Living in Society

Neglecting Public Health

Tobacco smoke. Photo by Jill Burrow on Pexels.com

I spent six years on my county’s board of health. It was the most substantial volunteer work I have done. We touched upon almost every aspect of the community and it felt like we were making a difference. Under Republican leadership the state’s public health system is getting worse.

Let’s talk about cancer. According to the Iowa Cancer Registry, an estimated 21,000 Iowans will be diagnosed with cancer in 2024. Iowa has the fastest-growing rate of new cancers and the second-highest rate of new cancers in the country, according to the report. Breast cancer, lung cancer, and prostate cancer make up 40.5 percent of new cancer diagnoses. Iowa deaths from cancer are trending down, yet at what point will increases in diagnosed cancers take the death rate another direction?

Is alcohol use about personal freedom or regulation? Iowa has the fourth highest rate of binge drinking in the country, which the Centers for Disease Control defines as five or more drinks on one occasion for men and four or more for women. When that is the case, public health should be stepping in. In part, that is why we study data. Alcohol is a leading cause of cancer, among other maladies.

Are decisions to use tobacco also personal? I suppose so, yet there are more than 345,000 Iowans who smoke cigarettes and our smoking rate remains above the national average of 12.9%. Tobacco use is also a leading cause of cancer.

What is the Republican-led state government doing about tobacco use? On April 18, the Iowa House passed HF2673 to eliminate the state’s longstanding Tobacco Use Prevention and Control Program. The law would place tobacco prevention under a larger agency along with programs related to gambling, substance abuse, and addiction disorders. After previously passing the Senate, Governor Reynolds is expected to sign the bill. The FY25 Health and Human Services state budget bill currently being considered also eliminates dedicated funding for the state’s tobacco prevention program.

Don’t get me started on pesticide use, air quality, and water pollution.

As a former member of the county board of health, I know a lot of activity is based upon how the state and federal governments set regulations and requirements. What is now happening is an unseen erosion of public health that will eventually take a noticeable toll. A good public health program is about prevention. Under Republican governance, prevention is not as important as it once was.

Here is a link to the Iowa Democratic Party to get involved today.

Categories
Living in Society

Immigration Iowa-Style

Photo by Matt Barnard on Pexels.com

In an effort to present a contrast with Joe Biden, Republicans insist upon elevating immigration as a top tier 2024 campaign issue. My issue with this is they lie, dissemble, and obstruct.

Are there are many “contacts” at the border. Yes. Is there a problem with illegal importation of the narcotic fentanyl? Yes. Are there 15 million undocumented persons inside the U.S. border right now? Probably yes. Why don’t politicians do something about this? Republicans decided that instead of legislating our country out of a potential problem, they would rather use immigration as one of three key issues to cudgel Joe Biden as president. (The other two are right to choose, and the economy).

On the April 5 edition of Iowa Press, Jeff Kaufmann was asked about abortion suppressing Republican voter turnout: “You know, I think it remains to be seen when you’ve got this overwhelming interest and these overwhelming numbers in terms of people’s disappointment on the border and with the economy. What is the bandwidth in terms — can you have three major issues? Can you have four? Is immigration going to overwhelm the issues debate? We’re ready for that debate.”

I don’t know anyone among my neighbors and friends for whom immigration is a significant issue. For Iowa Republicans, immigration is a top three issue.

Kaufmann explained the electoral calculus to Brianne Pfannenstiel of the Des Moines Register.

And quite frankly, Brianne, I’d like to say it’s all rallying around Donald Trump, but there’s also an element there too of if you have a choice between Donald Trump and Joe Biden, even people that are not necessarily thrilled about the personality of Donald Trump, they’re going to vote for Donald Trump.

When the founders wrote the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution, immigrants were on their collective mind. Many of the founders were immigrants themselves, and no one asked native populations whether white immigrants from Europe were legal or could take the land and physically remove them. When the British began importation of slaves to North America in 1619, few people considered this human chattel to be immigrants, let alone have standing with the government. In short, white colonists began protecting their stolen and domineering rights with the 1790 Naturalization Act, which required two years of residence in the country, “good moral character,” and that an applicant must be a “free white person.” The bias toward white naturalization continued until 1965 when Lyndon Johnson opened the country’s doors to immigration from other parts of the world.

Current immigration policy, Iowa-style, is a reaction to liberal policies dating back to LBJ.

Anyone paying attention can see what’s going on:

  • The governor sends Iowa National Guard Troops to Texas to help with border patrol.
  • Iowa members of Congress voted to impeach Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas.
  • Senators Chuck Grassley and Joni Ernst signed a petition to Majority Leader Chuck Schumer to bring the impeachment to an immediate trial.
  • Senate Majority Leader immediately takes a vote and dismisses both articles of impeachment. The votes were 51-48 and 51-49, both along party lines.
  • Characterization of fentanyl addiction as a killer (by Miller-Meeks, et. al) when Iowa has one of the lowest drug overdose mortality rates in the nation.
  • Wanton use of the phrase “every state is a border state” when nothing could be further from the truth. If Iowa was a border state, there would be no reason to send troops to Texas.

I don’t expect everyone to agree with me. All the same, there are more important issues at stake in this election. The only way to overcome Republican hyperbole about the border is to elect Democrats.

Here is a link to the Iowa Democratic Party to get involved today.

Categories
Living in Society

Absent a Moral Compass

Photo by Ylanite Koppens on Pexels.com

The wealthy and powerful made up their minds. They want a Republican President and Congress. Never mind their last Republican President went on trial yesterday. Never mind that corruption is endemic to what they do in the Congress. Never mind 45 failed to follow the most basic protocols regarding the security of national intelligence. They are lining up at the boarding station for the Trump train.

Heather Cox Richardson reported this as the triumph of politics over principle, citing an interview of New Hampshire governor Chris Sununu:

“Just to sum up,” Stephanopoulos said, “You support [Trump] for president even if he’s convicted in [the] classified documents [case]. You support him for president even though you believe he contributed to an insurrection. You support him for president even though you believe he’s lying about the last election. You support him for president even if he’s convicted in the Manhattan case. I just want to say, the answer to that is yes, correct?”

Sununu answered: “Yeah. Me and 51% of America.”

Letters from an American by Heather Cox Richardson, April 14, 2024.

This is another iteration of the phenomenon I mentioned on April 13. Republicans plan to mention Joe Biden, then dissemble about the character of their chosen candidate, lying, and using disinformation and misinformation to advance him. Sununu was clearly lying when he said 51 percent of America would support 45 in the November election. It seems doubtful 51 percent of the electorate would do so.

How did we get to a place where the truth no longer matters in our politics? There has been conflict between faith and reason from time immemorial. How did we become such a rudderless society? How did Republicans lose self-awareness that their brand is one of corruption, criminality, greed, and grifting?

These are questions with a foothold in reality.

I understand we should distance ourselves from the noise and focus on doing what we can to elect Democrats in November. Let’s hope lack of a moral compass doesn’t spread within our cohort. If we do the work, morality and the truth will prevail. At least, that’s the hope.

Categories
Living in Society

How Abortion is a Campaign Issue

Photo by Karolina Grabowska on Pexels.com

The topic of abortion exploded in our news media this week. It had a short fuse. Historian Heather Cox Richardson summarized two national news events in her April 9 Letter from an American:

Yesterday, former president Trump released a video celebrating state control over abortion; today, a judicial decision in Arizona illuminated just what such state control means. With the federal recognition of the constitutional right to abortion gone since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, old laws left on state books once again are becoming the law of the land.

Letters from an American, Heather Cox Richardson, April 9, 2024.

On Thursday, the Iowa Supreme Court heard oral arguments regarding Senate File 359, which specified after cardiac activity can be detected in a fetus, at about six weeks, abortion is banned. The law was blocked by the high court. Now that Roe vs. Wade has been overturned, Governor Reynolds seeks to reinstate the law.

Midst the shrapnel of takes about these events, folks are missing something. Simply put, abortion is one of three primary issues Republicans intend to leverage against President Joe Biden to strengthen their weak case for support in the electorate. The other two are the southern border and the economy. None of these will gain traction without accompanying Republican lies, distortion, and disinformation.

While a majority of Americans support a woman’s reproductive rights, including access to abortion, in the street fight that will be the 2024 political campaigns in Iowa, and across the country, a peculiar take on abortion will be a campaign issue. Trump did a poor job of articulating it during his video this week, but managed to squeeze it in, saying some favor abortion “up to and even beyond nine months.” Good grief! The Democratic position since Dobbs has been to codify the protections of Roe vs. Wade. There is no such thing as abortion beyond birth in Roe, or anywhere else. It is a lie for 45 to suggest there is.

I don’t agree with Iowa Republican Party Chair Jeff Kaufmann’s view, but he did a better job of articulating their tactics to use abortion as a campaign issue. Kaufmann was asked by Kay Henderson, moderator of Iowa Press:

Let’s shift to the general election and one of the major issues that will be presented. And your party’s nominee, Donald Trump, has said some states have gone too far in the post-Dobbs era. Is that going to be something that depresses turnout and votes for Republicans in Iowa in November?

Iowa Press, Iowa Public Television, April 5, 2024.

At the end of a somewhat rambling answer, Kaufmann got to abortion and said,

My guess is if you’ve got an independent voter that is somewhere in the middle of this particular issue and they’re going to have to move one way or the other and if abortion is that main issue, my guess they’re going to see abortion all the way to the point of birth, which you can’t get a major Democrat even in Iowa to say that they are against, versus a heartbeat bill, I will put my money on the fact that they’re going to go with a heartbeat bill and they’re going to go with the Republican position any time over abortion on demand up to the point of birth.

Iowa Press, Iowa Public Television, April 5, 2024.

There is no such thing as “abortion on demand up to the point of birth.” What Democrats seek to do is codify the protections for women that were found in Roe vs. Wade. Kaufmann is spreading disinformation.

“Democrats believe everyone deserves the right to make their own healthcare decisions,” according to the Iowa House Democrats April 8 newsletter. “Especially when it comes to reproductive care and abortion.” Government should have no role in a discussion between a pregnant woman and her doctor. None.

The difference is in tactics. Republicans can’t win the election if they tell the truth and they know it. Democrats who focus on polling which shows a majority of Iowans favor the right to an abortion, or who advance positive issues related to reproductive health care, aren’t wrong. What would be wrong is a failure to confront the lies, disinformation, and misinformation presented by Republicans to win over the electorate in the run up to the November election. I would like to see Iowa Democrats be more aggressive in fighting Republican lies regarding abortion or any issue. With the right encouragement from voters, I am confident they will.

Here is a link to the Iowa Democratic Party to get involved today.

Categories
Living in Society

Talk Up Joe Biden

Joe Biden

In an interview with Missouri political activist Jess Piper, Iowa journalist Doug Burns captured this statement:

“I specifically don’t talk about Biden because all he’s doing is delivering roads and that sort of thing, but they need to talk about who’s really impacting their life and that’s people in the Statehouse,” Jess Piper, the executive director of Blue Missouri and the host of the “Dirt Road Democrat” podcast, said in an interview with The Iowa Mercury.

The Iowa Mercury Substack by Douglas Burns, March 31, 2024.

What in the bleeding hell? Maintained roads, bridges, airports and the like don’t impact people’s lives?

Where to begin?

Piper was in Des Moines to speak at a Progress Iowa meeting celebrating the organization’s 12th birthday. Her statement is an example of “one size fits all” political advocacy. She denies complex realities of modern campaigning and should be rejected out of hand. It is possible Burns took her out of context, yet I doubt it.

The kernel of truth in the statement is voters just expect that government will take care of infrastructure without making a big to-do about it. For example, in August 2023, as the the intersection improvements at Interstates 80 and 380 neared completion, there was a photo opportunity for local elected officials to celebrate the five-year project. No one gives two hoots in a holler that politicians were there at the end of the $387 million interchange project. Sure, the money for the project came from government. The government was doing what it is designed to do. Does the new interchange impact my life? It certainly does, contrary to Piper’s statement.

Here’s the rub. While the Biden Administration gets full credit for promoting and working with the Congress to pass the Infrastructure and Investment Jobs Act, it was needed because of decades of bipartisan neglect of our roads, bridges, airports and railways. Biden exercised his power and influence to convince a do-nothing Congress to do something in the real world. The need was so obvious, even Republican Chuck Grassley broke ranks with Iowa Congressional Republicans and voted for the bill. That is something positive about Biden. Why wouldn’t we mention it? Chuck Grassley certainly does when funds from the new law hit Iowa.

What should Democrats be saying to voters?

Let’s start with elections 101: voter registrations. On April 1, the Iowa Secretary of State reported 1,521,112 active, registered voters in the state. Of those, 460,253 were registered Democratic, 608,383 Republican, and the remaining 452,476 No Preference or Other. With a diverse electorate, at 30,000 feet, “one size fits all” is preposterous.

What about something that matters more: the constant barrage of lies, misrepresentations and disinformation originating in the governor’s office? This week, Governor Reynolds released a press release supporting the Iowa Attorney General’s lawsuit against the Securities and Exchange Commission. The SEC is implementing a Greenhouse Gas Disclosure Rule and Iowa Republicans don’t like it. Here is the governor’s statement:

Joe Biden has become a radical climate alarmist, seeking to transform every agency, including the SEC, into his personal EPA. The SEC is not a climate regulator, and the Greenhouse Gas Disclosure Rule is not constitutional. I appreciate Attorney General Bird taking the lead on this lawsuit, taking Biden to court yet again. It has become increasingly clear that the Biden Administration wants to destroy America’s energy independence, trounce on the sovereign rights of states, and cripple the livelihoods of American workers.

Press Release: Gov. Reynolds Statement on Iowa AG Lawsuit Against SEC, April 3, 2024.

Why is Reynolds making an issue of this? The press release is intended to enhance her political standing. Anyone who met and knows Joe Biden also knows he is far from being a “climate alarmist.” If anything, he could make further improvements to protect our air, water, and land. That phrase comes from conservative talking points handed down with fossil fuel money like that provided by Charles Koch. His organization, Americans for Prosperity, is a constant presence inside the state capitol, and Koch’s Heritage Foundation is a prime driver of conservative political initiatives in the state. Climate alarmist? Give me a break.

In the last sentence of her statement Reynolds denies the reality that under Biden, America has become a net exporter of petrochemicals and improved our energy independence. Far from “trouncing state’s rights,” Biden uses the authority of the federal government to make positive change when the states will not. I trust he will step in over Iowa’s failure to regulate agriculture to reduce pollution of our air and water. Iowa Republicans won’t like that either. Biden cripples American workers? Poppycock! Governor Reynolds, work with your colleagues in the legislature to raise the minimum wage, improve workplace safety, and put real teeth in state regulations that affect workers. This sentence, along with the entire press release, is intended to distract Iowas from real issues that impact their lives. I submit there is plenty to talk about here. In a time of misinformation and disinformation our governor is leading the pack. Democrats can’t allow her statements to exist in a vacuum.

Democrats will never get away with saying only that Joe Biden is great. What we should add to our political discussions is correcting the lies and disinformation coming from the state’s highest officials on a daily basis. We also need to be talking up what Joe Biden has done for Iowans. He is doing what Iowa Republicans have not and they seem to be bristling under his achievements.

Jess Piper appears from her public presence to be a good person, a solid progressive. Iowa politics requires a difference approach from what she is using in Missouri.

Categories
Living in Society

Women To Read And Follow

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

According to the website Wordsrated, the average American adult reads five books per year. 51.6 percent of Americans don’t finish a single book in a year. Therefore, I am pretty optimistic when I say we should be reading these eight female authors. Don’t get me wrong. Men can be fine writers. It’s just that these women are particularly relevant to this moment in history when authoritarianism is knocking at American’s door.

Jane Mayer If you read only one book this year, make it Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right. From the dust jacket: “…a network of exceedingly wealthy people with extreme libertarian views bankrolled a systemic, step-by-step plan to alter the American political system.”

Nancy MacLean Ever hear of James McGill Buchanan? Maybe not but you should learn about his influence in altering the rules of democratic governance. MacLean tells this story in Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right’s Stealth Plan for America.

Naomi Oreskes Beginning with Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming, Oreskes and co-author Erik M. Conway analyzed issues related to advertising and deceiving the public for private gain. Their latest book, The Big Myth: How American Business Taught Us to Loathe Government and Love the Free Market is timely and relevant. Oreskes also wrote Why Trust Science?

Alice Miranda Ollstein Ollstein is a health care reporter for POLITICO, covering Capitol Hill. Her beat includes women’s reproductive rights and she is at the top of the game in covering the issue. Follow her here.

Anne Nelson Shadow Network: Media, Money, and the Secret Hub of the Radical Right. From the dust jacket: “This chilling story of the covert group masterminding the radical right’s ongoing assault on America’s airwaves, schools, environment, and, ultimately, its democracy.”

Dahlia Lithwick Lady Justice: Women, the Law, and the Battle to Save America is the story of women lawyers from around the country, independently of each other, fighting the good fight to hold the line as Trump, McConnell, and the Republican party did everything in their power to remake the judiciary in their own conservative image.

Barbara McQuade Attack from Within: How Disinformation is Sabotaging America, comes at a perfect time for this presidential election year. It is relevant, engaging, and necessary in its discussion of misinformation and disinformation in American society. It is part explainer and part map for addressing these issues. You’ll want to read this one straight through.

Elizabeth Cronise McLaughlin One of the co-founders of Indivisible, McLaughlin is a former New York Attorney (a federal court securities fraud litigator) who is covering the Trump trials and other relevant legal news from her home in Southern California. A main activity is her daily 30-minute YouTube broadcast called #ResistanceLive. Find it here. Not only does she report and interpret the news from a progressive viewpoint, she is funny, energetic, and intelligent. She encourages viewers to get involved with the 2024 election.

Please enter a comment with authors you believe progressives should be reading. You may be tempted to read some male authors and that’s fine… after you read these women.

To get involved with the Iowa Democratic Party, click here.

Categories
Living in Society

Dream Big, Get To Work

Is today a once in a lifetime chance to remake the nation? I know one thing. Elizabeth Cronise McLaughlin is right, Democrats need to dream big and get to work. What does that mean?

Iowa Democrats cannot resign themselves to the idea Iowa is a red state, or that Republican control of state government is inevitable. Republicans are in charge now and they haven’t always been. They will unlikely always be. The dream for Democrats is to make substantial progress toward retaking control of our government, culminating with voting Governor Kim Reynolds out of office in 2026. While we are at it, we could get rid of Attorney General Brenna Bird and other Republican statewide elected officials. I’m laying that marker down. Democrats in control after the 2026 general election.

What does “get to work” mean? Accept that elections matter and regardless of what small part we play in them, do more than simply vote. There are plenty of ways to get involved in campaigns, beginning with talking to reluctant voters in your family and contacting the local Democratic Party to volunteer.

I expressed my concerns about conventional campaigning last August. This post is not about that. This post is about a special election this week to the Alabama state legislature where Democrat Marilyn Lands won by 28 points in a district that voted for Trump in 2020. Lands made abortion rights and access to in vitro fertilization major themes of her campaign. She serves as an example that flipping a red district is possible.

Can we “remake the nation into a radically more just and equitable one from top to bottom,” as McLaughlin suggested? This may be our defining moment, yet only if we can recognize the hope and possibility it presents. Only if we roll up our sleeves and get to work.

I have faith the people of Iowa will rise up and reject Republican posturing to do what is right for Iowa and the nation. Winning is possible if we dream big and get to work.

Here is a link to the Iowa Democratic Party to get involved today.