Categories
Living in Society

District 2 Politics

Rural Polling Place

At a political event in rural Cedar Township one attendee said to me Phil Hemingway had a good chance of winning the supervisor election in District 2 of Johnson County. The Republican may win that township. Trump won the area in 2024, and Mariannette Miller-Meeks won there in 2022, including in my precinct, also located in the northeast corner of liberal Johnson County. There is more to the story.

Hemingway has run for office so many times I lost count. He hasn’t changed much, if anything in his policy positions and campaign rhetoric. I’m confident Republicans like him for that, yet his brand of what I will call “doctrinaire consistency” indicates he is out of touch with Johnson County voters. This is evidenced by his repeated losses while running for supervisor.

If he were a serious candidate, there would be some evidence of modifying his message to accommodate voter feedback. Instead, he relies upon a familiar set of policy positions and critiques of government that remained unchanged over multiple campaigns.

Things do change in Johnson County. Not least of the changes was a law Republicans like Hemingway helped craft that divided the county into supervisor districts. The idea was rural parts of the county would get better representation. While he may have made his colleagues happy by his contributions to bringing this policy idea into law, there is little evidence it will work, based on the districts created by the Legislative Services Agency.

The precinct level voting across District 2 show a consistent pattern in both 2022 and 2024. (Data is publicly available on the Johnson County Auditor website). While Republican candidates perform strongly in rural townships—Cedar, Fremont-Lincoln-Lone Tree, and Big Grove-Solon Annex—the margins are not large enough to offset overwhelming Democratic advantages in Iowa City precincts. In other words, all the work done by Hemingway and others to create this supervisor district election was for naught.

A review of Hemingway’s public record—especially in light of his 2021 defeat to Jon Green—shows a political persona defined more by consistency than evolution. Across multiple campaigns and in his earlier service on the Iowa City school board, Hemingway maintained a stable set of themes, rhetorical habits, and political positioning. What has changed since 2021 is limited.

The Cedar Township event attendee next said to me, “Well, he was elected to the school board.” Indeed he was. I first encountered Hemingway at the Iowa City Community School Board meetings where I was a reporter for the North Liberty Leader. I remember him as something of a gadfly who liked to hear himself speak and frequently asked questions at the public meeting. I saw no questions of his had substantial impact on the board’s actions.

I was finished at the North Liberty Leader when Hemingway was elected to the school board. There is some public record of his proposals related mainly to budget. Sometimes he made vague assertions about policy, as many Republicans do. Because his was a minority view, the board continued to do their work without taking him seriously. I would like to know how many 6-1 votes there were with him being the one. Others tell me there were more than a few.

Data and math kill his chances in the upcoming supervisor election.

The distribution of votes across District 2 raises a structural problem for a candidate like Hemingway. His base of support is geographically concentrated and numerically limited, while the opposition vote is both larger and more efficiently distributed across the district. Under these conditions, repeating the same campaign strategy is unlikely to produce a different outcome.

Hemingway continues to use the same tools he has from his earliest campaigns, expecting different results. He should put away his hammer if he wants a chance at winning because every problem is not a nail.

The creation of supervisor districts was intended, in part, to amplify rural representation. However, District 2 illustrates the limits of that approach. Even with rural precincts grouped together, the inclusion of multiple high-turnout Iowa City precincts creates a built-in advantage for Democratic candidates. The result is not a competitive balance, but a district where electoral outcomes are relatively predictable.

I predict the winner of the June 2 primary between Democrats Jessica Andino, Janet Godwin, and Jon Green will also easily win the November general election.

Categories
Sustainability

Stories About Forests

Part of the forestry preserve at Lake Macbride State Park.

I was taken aback by the administration’s decision to dismantle the U.S. Forest Service. Jim Pattiz outlined what happened in his substack post, “Trump Administration Orders Dismantling of the U.S. Forest Service.” What they are doing is bad. While the news broke suddenly, and agreements were signed quickly, the future of roughly 193 million acres of forests and grasslands not carved up with roads or clear cut logging has been up in the air for decades. With this administration, loggers and anti-government agents appear to be getting their way.

In 1970, Joan Didion opened her celebrated book The White Album by saying, “We tell ourselves stories in order to live.” The U.S. Forest Service action reminded me of this and the competing stories it represents.

One story, summarizing Scott Russell Sanders in A Conservationist Manifesto, goes like this. The national forest represent a wilderness with something to teach us. We are part of a living biome. We should protect these wild places as a habitat for wildlife, as a reservoir of natural processes, and as a refuge for the human spirit. The U.S. Forest Service adds a layer by being a research arm of the federal government.

Another story , according to Sanders, asserts that to “lock up” these acres from development would cost jobs, handicap economic growth, and “threaten the American way of life by denying us access to fuel and timber.” We Americans should be free to go into the warehouse that is nature and do whatever we want, regardless of consequences. It is squandering resources to not harvest timber from national forests and refrain from building roads there.

My story is we lie to ourselves by saying we can lawsuit our way out of this. Already, the Center for Biological Diversity and the Sierra Club filed lawsuits challenging the USDA’s “interim final rule” that removed public comment and environmental review procedures for forest projects, arguing the fast-track rules violate the Administrative Procedure Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. I wish them well. But shouldn’t we be able to agree that the 8.5% of land these acres represent should be set aside and preserved? It is very American to settle this in courts rather than in the hearts and minds of citizens.

In typical fashion for this administration, they are moving very quickly to dismantle the U.S. Forest Service, using the playbook developed to change the Bureau of Land Management during Trump 1.0. The headquarters will move from Washington, D.C. to Utah, and much of the research into how to prevent forest fires, and related issues will apparently end. Many employees will resign because they can’t support what the administration is doing or leave because moving to Utah is not a pleasant prospect. This is the change Republicans seek.

On my daily walks through the woods on a gravel trail, I consider the quiet and beauty of place. The sounds of bird life fill the air, and the air breathes fresh and clean, that is, unless a wind blows in from a concentrated animal feeding operation. We all need this type of solace from time to time.

We do what we can to survive in a Republic. Lawsuits are part of that as are competing stories about our experiences with the same things. I seek to be part of the biome and contribute to its well being: At the same time, I seek to understand all these stories and more, to contribute more than I take, while taking only what I need to survive and protect the commons for future inhabitants of Earth. That is a just path.

Categories
Living in Society

Beyond Joe Trippi’s Technology

Toolbox.
Toolbox.

Joe Trippi’s 2004 work to mine the internet and empower supporters of the Howard Dean campaign was revolutionary. As he described it, it was an “open-source revolution” that went beyond the dissemination of campaign messages. Using Meetup.com, blogs, and other media, he turned hundreds of thousands of volunteers into decentralized, self-organizing activists who powered fundraising and local organizing — like a “virtual mid-size city.” It was something to see in real time.

Since then, there have been two distinct iterations in the use of information technology in campaigns. The first was the Republican Party’s use of Cambridge Analytica to microtarget individual voters during the 2016 Trump campaign. While the success of this operation continues to be debated — and how it worked was not transparent — it was a compelling idea for moving beyond bulk messaging that delivers identical messages regardless of individual differences. What made it a game changer was that voter persuasion could be individualized at scale. On the darker side, Cambridge Analytica announced it was shutting down and filing for insolvency in May 2018. The closure was a direct result of intense media scrutiny, investigations, and the loss of clients following the March 2018 revelations that it misused data from up to 87 million Facebook users.

That progressives need to catch up with Republicans in the use of technology seems evident. This challenge is complicated by the advent of readily available, yet still unproven, artificial intelligence technologies like Claude, ChatGPT, and Google Gemini.

Today, it isn’t entirely clear how artificial intelligence will be used in campaigns. We do know a few things. U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders recently sat for an interview with Anthropic’s Claude. (Click here for a clip from that conversation, which exposes some of the motivations for collecting data from internet users.) We also know we need to balance ethical safeguards on AI with innovation in tools that could benefit progressive causes. Finally, misinformation and AI-generated propaganda could undermine democratic processes. What do we do?

What we can’t do is stick our collective progressive heads in the sand. I can’t count how many people I’ve heard say something like, “AI uses too much energy, so I won’t use it.” Two things about this. First, privacy issues are more important than energy use. Second, energy use compared to what?

In her new book, Clearing the Air: A Hopeful Guide to Solving Climate Change in 50 Questions and Answers, author Hannah Ritchie writes, “Data centers currently use only a few percent of the world’s electricity. The big question, though, is whether this will explode with the rise of AI. Probably not.” She discusses a Pareto-style analysis that points to the true energy hogs. Not surprisingly, these are industry, buildings, electric vehicles, air conditioning, and heating, with data centers eighth on the list at around 1-3 percent of consumption. At a minimum, progressives need to stop hyping unknown energy scenarios and instead resolve issues around privacy (Senator Sanders has a bill) while pressuring Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic to meet their corporate climate goals.

Dealing in facts, not hyperbole, is always good advice.

AI is imperfect and no substitute for grassroots knowledge about campaigns and the real voters who will participate in elections. While the database of personal profiles AI draws upon is vast, the granular knowledge that a political activist in a specific race possesses is more relevant to an individual’s potential behavior than AI ever will be.

Like other technologies, AI is a tool that belongs in campaign toolboxes. It is an extension of what Joe Trippi did so long ago — and it is worth learning about instead of shunning.

Categories
Living in Society

Meet and Greet

After talking with the three candidates for Johnson County Supervisor in District 2, I decided to support Jon Green in the June 2 Democratic primary. All three would make great supervisors, but Jon, the incumbent, is the person who worked to gain consensus among board members on building a new jail. That was difficult work, and I support his re-election so he can finish it.

It’s no more complicated than that.

The Republican in this race is Phil Hemingway. When I was covering Iowa City Community School District board meetings for the North Liberty Leader, I listened to him ask questions — often multiple ones at each board meeting. He was engaged and once won election to the school board.

I looked at historical voting numbers in the precincts that make up new District 2, and the votes are there to defeat Hemingway resoundingly in his sixth bid for supervisor — badly enough that he will never run for this office again. That would free him to return to automotive work until he retires.

I am working for Green to win the primary. If he doesn’t, whoever does will have my full support.

Categories
Living in Society

Post Convention Organizing

Ed Cranston and Tom Larkin announcing the number of delegates (114) attending the county convention on March 21, 2026.

With the county convention in the rear view mirror, it’s time to organize for the Democratic primary. Our votes are important, yet three races are at the top of the list here: the U.S. Senate race between Zach Wahls and Josh Turek, and the District 2 county supervisor race between Jessica Andino, Janet Godwin and incumbent Jon Green lead. The U.S. House race matters, yet Christina Bohannan is widely expected to win the primary over challenger Travis Terrell. It’s her third go-around, so she should. My main work this week has been organizing a supervisor meet and greet event this afternoon at the Solon Public Library. After that, it is a mad rush to the June 2 primary.

There was no competition in Johnson County to be a delegate to the district and state conventions and that’s okay. I decided not to advance to district either. There are too many other things begging for our attention to engage in rituals. The thrill is gone from Democratic conventions, and that too, is okay. Promoting Democratic policy in our communities is where most of the action will be in 2026, I predict.

What does that mean?

Partly, it means participating in campaigns. It also means talking to voters about the race and why it is important to support Democrats. The latter is not a given and this graphic of results from the 2024 general election in my precinct tells why:

RaceRepublicanDemocrat
PresidentTrumpHarris
699598
U.S. HouseMiller-MeeksBohannan
700617
State SenatorDriscollChabal
741526
State RepresentativeLawlerGorsh
716545

We voted Obama twice and Trump three times shifting from blue to solidly Republican. The numbers suggest it is possible to turn that around but not without significant work. My first order of business is to figure out which activists remain after we suffered some people becoming less active, moving out of the precinct, and dying.

Once more activists are located, the next step is finding ways to talk to neighbors and then convert them, if possible, to turn the precinct from red to blue.

There are two parts to this, in my precinct, and in the rest of the state and country. Both run through the ballot box.

The first is voting: making sure we take care of ourselves by checking our registration and then voting in person, either early or on election day. Encourage everyone we know to do likewise.

The second is changing the public narrative about life in Iowa and in the United States. We should not accept narratives being fed to us by media outlets, churches, interest groups, and political parties. Rather, we should develop our own new narratives that reflect how we live despite our differences. I predict this will change how we vote.

If we can do those things, there is a chance to make society a better place to live, possibly this election cycle.

Now it’s a matter of getting out there and doing it.

Categories
Living in Society

Photos from the Convention

Iowa City West High School. Location of the Johnson County Democrats County Convention on March 21, 2026.

114 delegates to the Johnson County Democratic Convention gathered on Saturday, March 21, at Iowa City West High School. It was an intense day of political conversations, which physically drained me. Here are my favorite photos.

Placard in front of West High School on March 21, 2026.
Categories
Living in Society

Nanny State — County Supervisor Edition

Governor Kim Reynolds signed into law Senate File 75 on April 11, 2025. Photo provenance unknown.

When Governor Kim Reynolds signed Senate File 75 into law on April 1, 2025, a crowd of Republican well-wishers was present.

Senate File 75 mandates that Iowa counties containing a Board of Regents university — specifically Johnson, Story, and Black Hawk — change their county supervisor elections from an at-large to a district-based system. The law has gone into effect and we are working through the new process.

Those at the signing ceremony included one Phil Hemingway who ran repeatedly and unsuccessfully for supervisor in Johnson County where I live. Hemingway backed this legislation. This week he filed for election to the Johnson County board of supervisors again, this time in newly created District 2. His is the bellwether race to see if Republican ideas on this prevail. Can they win a seat on the now all-Democratic board?

“Important to me personally was the passage of the county supervisor election reform bill,” Republican State Senator Dawn Driscoll said, “which protects the voices of our full-time residents in counties with large student populations.”

Driscoll’s colleague Republican State Representative Judd Lawler was not far behind.

“This legislation will improve local representation and accountability at the county level,” he said. “By using districts in these counties, the law promotes a more fair representation structure. This is particularly important in areas with highly transient populations, as it allows for better representation of all county residents, particularly rural and small-town residents.”

Driscoll and Lawler both represent parts of Johnson County.

Opponents, including local officials, argued the law targets specific areas and violates county home rule principles. A lawsuit filed in late 2025 challenged the law’s constitutionality, claiming it violates equal protection.

Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that the law does not impede any voter rights and that the state has a legitimate regulatory interest in differentiating counties that host a regents-led university. The court rejected the motion.

“While the matter may be appropriate for disposition on summary judgment, the Court is not persuaded that it is the exceptional type of case that is appropriate for dismissal at the pre-answer stage of litigation. Therefore, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss should be denied,” the ruling states.

The district court also denied the motion for a temporary injunction which would have immediately blocked the law from going into effect. A non-jury trial is set to begin on March 3, 2027, long after the first election under the new process.

The horse seems out of the proverbial barn.

Even if plaintiffs win the case at trial, what happens next? That will be up to the judge. My Kentucky windage best shot is the new law is here to stay because if they were inclined to stop it, the court would have granted the injunction.

In the meanwhile, my small group of Democrats is organizing a get to know the supervisor candidate event in the new District 2, on March 28, at 1 p.m. at the Solon Public Library. Three Democratic candidates filed: incumbent Jon Green, Janet Godwin, and Jessica Andino. The winner of the June 2, primary will face Hemingway during the November general election.

Categories
Living in Society

Nanny State — School Board Edition

West Branch School Board Member Mike Owen at a public meeting with Governor Terry Branstad.

The Ankeny Community School District defined SSA (State Supplemental Aid) as the cost of living adjustment for school budgets. “To keep pace with rising costs, SSA needs to at least match inflation. If it does not, we would need to thoughtfully consider our budgeting strategy and staffing plans,” according to their website. Each cycle public debate is whether the amount approved by Republicans meets Democratic expectations to support public schools. Mostly it does not and Iowa Republicans have been in the majority longer than kindergarten students have been alive. They have the votes to pass what they will.

Tuesday’s front page headline that Iowa City Schools were years behind in audits is not making the case for more money in SSA. While next year’s level of two percent was approved in February, the financial issues cast a cloud over the school board’s independence. Republicans with a mind to consolidate government operations at the state level might be salivating at the prospects manifest in this local failure.

When I was covering the Iowa City School Board for the North Liberty Leader newspaper, I had a working relationship with their Chief Financial Officer, which I needed to write my stories. While the superintendent tried to maneuver him away from me, I usually got answers I needed. I spent decades in management at a large company and the district’s CFO was as good as any financial officer I have known. What happened, besides changing CFOs?

“The district’s most recent audit — completed two years after the end of that fiscal year — details corrective action needed, including previous district leadership not appearing to properly reconcile the district’s balance sheet,” according to the Cedar Rapids Gazette. “What reconciliations were available contained unknown variances.”

During a board meeting this week (March 5), board member Jayne Finch asked interim Chief Financial Officer Kim Michael-Lee to describe the status of the district’s books “in a few words.” Michael-Lee responded: “Unbalanced, unreconciled,” according to KGAN, the local CBS affiliate.

It’s not a good look found in a financial records audit by an outside firm just before a vote on budget cuts.

At a March 10, meeting, the school board voted to table a proposed $7.5 million budget cut until district finances could be presented in reasonable order. Because of inaccurately applying property tax revenue to appropriate budget line items, board members were unclear as to whether they could meet financial demands, including bond obligations, by June 1.

This is all a long lead in to: WTF Iowa City? Applying revenue to accounts is boilerplate accounting. If you can’t balance the checkbook, you keep working until you figure it out. Basic incompetence calls attention to the problems and when they see a problem like this, elected officials may use the only plan in their playbook: consolidate authority for school board finances at the state level.

Here’s hoping the Iowa City Community School District straightens things out in a timely manner. Let’s not give Des Moines any reasons to make Iowa more of a nanny state.

Categories
Living in Society

Conventions and Candidates

Hillary Clinton Delegates and Alternates at the Johnson County Democratic Convention March 12, 2016

My week in Iowa politics was about planning the county convention and finding a Democratic candidate to run for House District 91 and Senate District 46. One success and two failures.

At our precinct caucuses I volunteered to be on the committee on committees and attended the county-wide Zoom meeting. As in previous cycles, I volunteered for the Arrangements Committee where my background in transportation and logistics prepared me for anything that might happen. The co-chairs of the committee are great and the team put together what has the potential to be a valued convention. My first contribution was writing a paragraph about spreading contagious diseases for the convention booklet as follows:

Respiratory illnesses such as COVID-19 and influenza continue to circulate in our communities. To help reduce the risk of transmission, the Arrangements Committee will make face masks available at check-in for any attendee who wishes to use one.

I also volunteered to be an usher, directing people to designated sections of the seating area, to help set up and tear down, and be a general floater. We are almost ready with one week to go.

The search for candidates to run for the state house has been challenging. Because of a lack of interest in running for a seat currently occupied by a Republican, we have been seeking a person to prevent the Democratic ballot from being blank. In my experience, that’s not the best situation for voters or for candidates. While we are part of the so-called “liberal Johnson County,” our area has been trending Republican after twice voting for Obama as president and for Trump three times. I have been represented by a Republican House member beginning in 2013, and a Republican Senator after redistricting in 2023. Last cycle, no Democrat on the ballot was the top vote-getter.

In the 2022 Iowa Senate election, Republican Dawn Driscoll and Democrat Kevin Kinney duked it out in an expensive election to determine the future of the new district. The senate district leans Republican and Driscoll became our current senator, also defeating Democrat Ed Chabal in 2024. A few Democrats were kicking the tires on a run this year, yet no one is apparently collecting nominating petitions. Senate District 46 has no election in 2026.

Finding a Democrat to run in House District 91 has also been challenging. Elle Wyant ran in 2022, and Jay Gorsh in 2024. Both were great people who had commitments at work that held them from proper campaigning. As of the filing deadline, no one has stepped forward.

The secretary of state continues to review petition signatures and will release names once the paperwork has gone through the process. Click here to access the 2026 Primary Candidate list.

Even though the right candidate could beat Republicans in this district, after ten years of Bobby Kaufmann, and a new district favoring Republicans in 2022, I am resigned to work with Republicans to get anything done. My email contacts with my state senator and representative have been cordial and their responses quickly delivered. There is not much else to do if no Democrat will run.

Another local political issue took time this week: the event we are holding for Democratic candidates for county supervisor on March 28. Thanks to the Republican nanny state, we are electing supervisors in new districts instead of at large. The result is a slew of Democratic contenders to run against incumbents across the county. More on this next Saturday.

Keep working it, people. You know that’s the only way to win back our state!

Categories
Living in Society

Local Roads, Local Decisions

Chip and seal road in Johnson County, Iowa.

The township where I live was established before Iowa Statehood. There were oak, walnut, hickory, ash, elm, and cottonwood thriving here among numerous pure springs. The first sawmill and grist mill was built in 1839 by Anthony Sells on Mill Creek. Put the big groves of trees together with the sawmill and you have us. The forests were long gone when we bought our lot here. What dominates the landscape is culture we and others brought with us to an area where all trees indigenous to this part of Iowa once existed in abundance yet no longer do. Part of that culture was roads.

HF2667 and SF2394 have been introduced in the Iowa Legislature. They essentially let industry interests, meaning real estate developers, the Master Builders, the Home Builders, and the Concrete and Asphalt Associations, mandate what cities and counties are allowed to do with regard to design standards for roads in new developments. On March 4, HF2667 passed in the House 61-36, so this week’s action is in the Iowa Senate.

The industry wants freedom to set very low road design standards. They want those standards to be uniform for all new development in the state. They want standards to ignore differing local conditions such as soil types and terrain.  If local governments wanted better local standards, taxpayers would have to foot the bill, not developers.  These bills are wrong for Iowa.

Iowa road design standards are currently developed by experts at the ISU Institute for Transportation. A proposed law would shift control of the program to the Iowa Department of Transportation. The bill would require statewide compliance and impose financial penalties for non-compliance, even when local governments make changes based on site-specific conditions. The fiscal note estimates the change would remove $450,000 in revenue from Iowa State University and require the DOT to hire two employees costing $231,000. Another concern is which private-industry representatives might serve on the new board overseeing the program.

If the new bills became law, that could enable developers to build subpar roads in new developments and prevent local governments from having control. It is part of the Republican agenda of making Iowa a nanny state.

Developers must address roads while planning a subdivision, at the same time accountants put a pencil to it and determine potential profit. Saving money on roads is part of extracting every last dime out of a project.  When low-quality roads break down, the cost is paid by  taxpayers and homeowners, not developers.

When our developer turned his farm into a housing subdivision, he didn’t know what he was doing. There was a lawsuit regarding wastewater treatment. He spent the least possible amount on our two miles of roads, using chip and seal pavement. Evidence of his lack of financial expertise can be found in his declaration of bankruptcy.

The building trades behind the new bills do know what they are doing: extracting every possible penny from a project for investors. If the bill passes, it would play right into their hands.

It’s time for a talk with your state senator to urge them to reject the bill. Here is a link to SF 2394. Here is how to contact your legislators

Iowa does not need a new road-design-standards system that is worse than what we have now.