Week Nine

It’s no secret a new president has a limited amount of time before re-entering an election cycle. I assume our current president is not stupid and realizes, given recent polling, Republicans could well lose control of the U.S. House of Representatives in the 2026 midterms. Those campaigns crank up in about a year and that’s how much time he has to make his mark. This is politics 101, and nothing about the current administration modified that.

It’s been nine weeks since the inauguration and the resistance is getting more active, court cases more numerous. What became clearer this week is the plan, whether it be Project 2025 or whatever, is to move as quickly as possible to dismantle parts of the federal government to stay ahead of the courts. The courts are now catching up with the administration. They will not bend a knee to the president, even some justices appointed in the president’s first term. Public resistance to dismantling our government is also growing.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared he was done with USAID on Monday, March 10. He cancelled 83 percent of their contracts and rolled the remainder of them into the State Department. A done deal, one could reasonably say. On March 19, a federal judge ruled that Elon Musk and his DOGE team likely violated the Constitution when they effectively shut down USAID, National Public Radio reported. Out here in the middle of the country, that looks like too little, too late to save the organization. The jig is up, though. By executing their plan, they also disclose it, empowering the resistance.

When on Friday, March 14, the executive order to dismantle the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) came down, it didn’t take long for friends of libraries to respond. Over the weekend, libraries across the state launched an advocacy program to contact our elected officials to explain what the agency did and why it should not be dismantled. Various libraries explained it differently. Here is one example:

The State Library of Iowa relies on Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA) funding from the IMLS to deliver statewide library development initiatives and services to Iowa libraries and citizens. This critical funding is tied to matching dollars from the Iowa Legislature.

These funds directly support services our patrons depend on:

• Interlibrary loan system and twice-weekly delivery service
• Annual Summer Reading Program theme & resources, and the All Iowa Reads program
• Bridges (Libby app) platform fee and magazine collection for the statewide digital library consortium
• Brainfuse HelpNow online resource
• Website hosting
• Online calendar, registration, meeting room scheduling software
• Train and support skilled public librarians and effective library boards and the State Library Endorsement program
• Standards and Accreditation program for high quality libraries
• People’s Law Library of Iowa.

I haven’t time to follow all agencies affected by the administration’s executive orders, yet am guessing the same response is happening widely. The resistance is building. I sent my own email to elected officials, saying, “As a resident of your district, I don’t understand how the executive branch can intervene in a congressionally created agency, cancel grants, and in effect put it out of business. Please explain.” Senator Grassley’s office was first to respond. Here is an excerpt from his March 21 response:

I appreciate hearing of your support for IMLS employees and the programs they administer. I agree that Iowa’s libraries play an invaluable role in the lives of Iowans by promoting literacy and information access, and our museums are valuable cultural assets that enrich the lives of Iowans and promote tourism in Iowa communities.

At the onset, I understand and recognize many Iowans are concerned about the Executive Order I will be discussing in this message. I would like to take this time to share as much information as I know about this situation, and please know myself and my staff are continuing to monitor this situation.

Grassley’s response was something, yet it left me feeling dissatisfied because he doesn’t seem to know much more than I do. It seems clear moving quickly to address the administration’s action with members of the Congress should be a main tool in our resistance toolbox.

There is a lot to talk about. Let me close with this: The game in the reconciliation bill (that hasn’t been written yet) is to cut government costs by $1.5 Trillion to give a $4.5 Trillion tax cut to the wealthiest Americans. If they pass it, they are going to get the money somewhere, namely by incurring more debt. I know in my household budget, thinking like that doesn’t stand the scrutiny of family members. Even someone with a basic understanding of arithmetic sees the numbers don’t add up.

Bottom line: if we can’t afford a tax cut (and we can’t) without incurring additional debt, we shouldn’t legislate one. House Republicans don’t know how to write a federal budget, as evidenced by the need for a continuing resolution through the end of the fiscal year. There is plenty of time to resist a large tax cut for the wealthy. The resistance should keep our collective eyes on this ball.